{"id":10505,"date":"2022-08-04T17:36:44","date_gmt":"2022-08-04T16:36:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/?p=10505"},"modified":"2024-04-09T07:35:53","modified_gmt":"2024-04-09T06:35:53","slug":"populizmi-right-wing-ne-eu-sa-ndikim-ka-e-djathta-ekstreme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/?p=10505","title":{"rendered":"Populizmi “Right-Wing” n\u00eb EU – Sa ndikim ka e Djathta Ekstreme?"},"content":{"rendered":"

(S. Guraziu – G 22, Koment, dhe infografik\u00eb nga Anna Fleck – Statista, Q 2022)<\/em><\/p>\n

(…Wilders si “partiak” i vet\u00ebm, si nj\u00eb kacagjel politik ia b\u00ebn “kikirikuuuu” me 17 oktava t\u00eb “partis\u00eb fantomike”<\/strong>…)<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

N\u00eb zgjedhjet holandeze t\u00eb v. 2021, n\u00eb “peshoren politike” e djathta ekstreme PVV do peshonte si e 3-ta.
\nM\u00eb e forta ose m\u00eb e r\u00ebnda do ishte VVD-ja me 21.9% t\u00eb votave (34 vende), pastaj e 2-ta D66 me 15.0% (24 vende) dhe PVV do i fitonte 10.8% t\u00eb votave (17 vende).
\nDuket pak 10.8%, por jua them se nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb, i bie q\u00eb rreth 2 milion\u00eb holandez\u00eb mendojn\u00eb “nj\u00ebsoj” si Wilders – boooo imagjino, pothuaj 1 Kosov\u00eb e t\u00ebr\u00eb!<\/p>\n

Sipas meje, pati qen\u00eb Turqia si “sherr” dikur dhe votat e Holand\u00ebs sot jan\u00eb k\u00ebshtu (si\u00e7 shihen m\u00eb lart). Sa i p\u00ebrket spektrit politik t\u00eb s\u00eb sotmes holandeze, jozyrtarisht un\u00eb e “akuzoj” askend tjet\u00ebr por Turqin\u00eb. Po po, mir\u00eb e lexuat, s’qe ndonj\u00eb gaboshkrim – pik\u00ebrisht Turqin\u00eb. Dmth. kuptohet akuza \u00ebsht\u00eb “jozyrtare”, thjesht akuz\u00eb e imja, personale. P\u00ebr fat t\u00eb keq, s’kam as vullnet as koh\u00eb, por n\u00eb fakt do duhej t’i shkruaja madje dhe let\u00ebr Presidentit t\u00eb Turqis\u00eb, pakashum\u00eb ngjash\u00ebm si Zola dikur Presidentit t\u00eb vet, “J’Accuse…!” : )<\/p>\n

Shtrohet pyetja \u00e7’lidhje na paska Turqia me nuancat dhe me ndryshimet e spektrit politik t\u00eb Holand\u00ebs?! Epo, s’ka ndonj\u00eb lidhje direkte, e sakt\u00eb, mir\u00ebpo ja q\u00eb ka di\u00e7 “indirekte”. Sipas meje t\u00eb gjitha “fajet indirekte” i takojn\u00eb Turqis\u00eb. P\u00ebrndryshe s’do hyja kurr\u00eb n\u00eb “hak”… as me akuza as me faj\u00ebsime. Le ta sqaroj sadopak duke sjellur nj\u00eb shembull “identik” nga historia…<\/p>\n

Jo shum\u00eb koh\u00eb para se t\u00eb vritej, ish-Presidenti amerikan Kennedy sikur qe tallur ose pati ironizuar me ca fakte “fatkeqe” t\u00eb historis\u00eb, me shakan\u00eb e vet e pati quajtur Londr\u00ebn “shkaktare” p\u00ebr historin\u00eb e sh\u00ebmtuar pothuaj t\u00eb gjith\u00eb shek. XX. Jo Londr\u00ebn si “Lond\u00ebr”… por nj\u00eb gazet\u00eb londoneze at\u00ebbot\u00eb na e pask\u00ebsh “hidh\u00ebruar e pezmatuar” Marksin sa s’ka m\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Gazeta pati refuzuar t’ia rriste pag\u00ebn nj\u00eb gazetari varfanjak me emrin Karl Marks, dhe si rrjedhoj\u00eb Marksi do frustrohej e do pezmatohej n\u00eb kulm, le q\u00eb do ikte por dhe (thuase nga “inati”) do b\u00ebhej ai Marksi i m\u00ebvonsh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n

Eh, sikur t’mos ta kishte b\u00ebr\u00eb at\u00eb “gabim trashanik” gazeta – qe shprehur Kennedy. Dmth. sipas tij n\u00ebse t’ia kishte rritur rrog\u00ebn, n\u00ebse gazeta ta kishte vler\u00ebsuar m\u00eb tep\u00ebr men\u00e7urin\u00eb e tij, patjet\u00ebr se Marksi do ndjehej i lumtur.<\/p>\n

Sa p\u00ebr spektrin kapitalistik londonez (t\u00eb asaj kohe), natyrisht Marksit at\u00ebbot\u00eb s’i shiteshin dhe aq men\u00e7urirat gazetareske. Ama me rritjen e pag\u00ebs helbete do na ishte “hutuar nga lumturia” dhe s’do merrej me “kapitalet” e me idet\u00eb tjera t\u00eb m\u00ebvonshme. K\u00ebshtu q\u00eb, Kennedy aludonte se me ndonj\u00ebfar\u00eb mrekullie t\u00eb “zhdrejt\u00eb”, do na kishte shp\u00ebtuar dhe vet\u00eb historia!<\/p>\n

***
\nPVV – Partij voor de Vrijheid (Partia p\u00ebr Liri) \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb parti nacionaliste, populiste e s\u00eb djatht\u00ebs holandeze. Qe themeluar n\u00eb v. 2006, (sipas meje) “jodemokratikisht” dhe paksa n\u00eb rrethana qesharake! Ideologjia e k\u00ebsaj “partie” si term, mbase mund t’p\u00ebrthekohet si sintez\u00eb e nacionalizmit, populizmit, anti-islamizmit, liberalizmit (komb\u00ebtar), anti-emigracionit, shovinizmit ekonomik (p\u00ebr mir\u00ebqenien holandeze), euroskepticizmit ekstrem etj.<\/p>\n

Prap\u00eb shtrohet pyetja, pse “jodemokratikisht”, pse thash\u00eb k\u00ebshtu? Epo, sepse PVV n\u00eb fakt nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb “parti”, ose \u00ebsht\u00eb di\u00e7 si “parti fantomike”, di\u00e7 si “shoqat\u00eb”, ose “asociacion” zyrtarisht me 1 an\u00ebtar t\u00eb vet\u00ebm. Realisht gjoja Geert Wilders (si kryeplaku partiak) nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht \u00ebsht\u00eb udh\u00ebheq\u00ebs dhe an\u00ebtari fillikat i partis\u00eb. Vall\u00eb, a nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb absurd, nj\u00eb lloj “absurdi” i kulluar, gjoja demokratik!<\/p>\n

K\u00ebshtu q\u00eb, n\u00ebse t\u00eb niseshim nga koncepti sadopak m\u00eb i st\u00ebrholluar demokratik, “partia” s’do duhej t’na ishte parti, s’do duhej t\u00eb konsiderohet e till\u00eb. Tekefundit sepse s’i plot\u00ebson kushtet e mir\u00ebfillta demokratike, madje \u00ebsht\u00eb dhe e “pap\u00ebrshtatshme” p\u00ebr financimin e saj nga qeveria.<\/p>\n

Mir\u00ebpo ja q\u00eb anonimiteti dhe “fantomikja” e votuesve si e drejt\u00eb legjitime e tyre, e legjitimojn\u00eb ak\u00ebcil\u00ebn struktur\u00eb politike t\u00eb till\u00eb. Si rrjedhoj\u00eb, n\u00eb realitetin politik PVV s’\u00ebsht\u00eb si t\u00eb tjerat, \u00ebsht\u00eb “parti e maskuar”, gjallon prapa “mask\u00ebs” fantomike dhe mb\u00ebshtetet nga donacionet e fansave.<\/p>\n

Gjith\u00e7ka pati nisur (thuase) nga “kryene\u00e7\u00ebsia”, nga pak\u00ebnaq\u00ebsia personale, ishte di\u00e7 si bojkot ndaj politik\u00ebs s\u00eb “partis\u00eb am\u00eb” (dikur Geert Wilders i takonte partis\u00eb VVD). N\u00eb v. 2004 do largohej nga VVD sepse assesi t\u00eb “pajtohej” me disa q\u00ebndrime t\u00eb partis\u00eb, s’mund ta pranonte q\u00ebndrimin pozitiv t\u00eb VVD ndaj an\u00ebtar\u00ebsimit t\u00eb mundsh\u00ebm t\u00eb Turqis\u00eb n\u00eb BE.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb rregull, s’t\u00eb p\u00eblqen ideja e Turqis\u00eb n\u00eb BE, do ik\u00ebsh, pse jo, udha e mbar\u00eb. Sipas rregulloreve klasike, at\u00ebbot\u00eb VVD-ja priste q\u00eb Wilders ta “dor\u00ebzonte” ul\u00ebsen e tij parlamentare. Mir\u00ebpo p\u00ebr \u00e7udi ky do refuzonte, s’do dor\u00ebzonte gj\u00eb, do vazhdonte ulur n\u00eb parlament si “partiak” i vet\u00ebm, si nj\u00eb kacagjel i politik\u00ebs pa\u00e7ka se gjoja si “Groep Wilders” (Grupi Wilders).
\nKy “grup” ose pak\u00ebnaq\u00ebsia e Wilders tek n\u00eb v. 2006 do b\u00ebhej PVV.<\/p>\n

Shkurt, i bie se pati qen\u00eb Turqia si “sherr” dhe historia politike e Holand\u00ebs tutje do merrte lloj-lloj nuancash, her\u00eb kameleonike e her\u00eb t\u00eb padukshme, fantomike. Ose, tekefundit mozaiku dhe spektri politik do b\u00ebhej akoma m\u00eb interesant. Q\u00eb n\u00eb hyrje t\u00eb komentit ve\u00e7 e tham\u00eb se vitin e kaluar PVV do i fitonte 10.8% t\u00eb votave (17 vende – nga 150 gjithsej).<\/p>\n

Ngjash\u00ebm si n\u00eb shum\u00eb vende t\u00eb bot\u00ebs, edhe parlamenti holandez funksionon sipas konceptit bikameral, legjislatura supreme dy-dhom\u00ebshe \u00ebsht\u00eb “States General”, p\u00ebrb\u00ebhet nga “Senati” (Eerste Kamer – 75 ul\u00ebse) dhe nga “Dhoma e P\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuesve” (Tweede Kamer – 150 ul\u00ebse).
\nPra \u00e7udia \u00ebsht\u00eb se babaxhani Wilders si nj\u00eb kacagjel politik me kacuret\u00ebn p\u00ebrpjet\u00eb, ia b\u00ebn “kikirikuuuu” me 17 oktava t\u00eb “partis\u00eb fantomike”, shpesh eho-ja i trullos\u00eb parlamentar\u00ebt sa mos pyet, ankohen p\u00ebr kok\u00ebdhimbje (ndoshta si ai Kok\u00ebdhima i Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb), jehon e gjith\u00eb salla e kuvend-parlamentit \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n

Andaj s’e kuptoj si mund t\u00eb quhet “pak” ekstremizmi prej 10.8%! Hm, k\u00ebndellu moj ti EU-bukuroshja, balansoje sadopak spektrin e politikave, silli n\u00eb ekuilib\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb varg e varg, me francez\u00eb e me hungarez\u00eb…<\/p>\n

( m\u00eb posht\u00eb, infografika dhe teksti nga Anna Fleck – Statista, Q 2022 – p\u00ebrgatitur nga sguraziu<\/strong> )<\/p>\n

E djathta ekstreme vazhdon me ndikimin e vet n\u00eb disa pjes\u00eb t\u00eb Evrop\u00ebs, Hungaria e kryeson list\u00ebn si vendi me m\u00eb s\u00eb shumti ul\u00ebse parlamentare t\u00eb mbajtura nga nj\u00eb parti e s\u00eb djatht\u00ebs ekstreme. Fidesz (e Viktor Orban-it) ia doli me nj\u00eb fitore t\u00eb madhe n\u00eb zgjedhjet legjislative t\u00eb vendit (2022), duke siguruar 59% t\u00eb parlamentit.<\/p>\n

Polonia gjat\u00eb viteve t\u00eb kaluara ka par\u00eb gjithashtu shpalosjen e nj\u00eb peizazhi politik populist, partia ultra-konservatore Ligj dhe Drejt\u00ebsi (PiS) i fitoi 51% t\u00eb vendeve n\u00eb asamblen\u00eb (Diet) e 2019.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb v. 2017-18, parti t\u00eb tjera t\u00eb s\u00eb djatht\u00ebs ekstreme erdh\u00ebn n\u00eb pushtet, FP\u00d6 n\u00eb Austri (28%, 2017), e ndjekur nga Lega e Matteo Salvinit n\u00eb Itali, e cila mban 21% t\u00eb vendeve n\u00eb parlamentin italian.
\nNdon\u00ebse FP\u00d6-ja austriake ka sh\u00ebnuar nj\u00eb r\u00ebnie t\u00eb popullaritetit, q\u00eb nga v.2019 p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebson vet\u00ebm 17% t\u00eb parlamentit, krahasuar me 28% n\u00eb v. 2017.<\/p>\n

Tjet\u00ebrkund n\u00eb BE, e djathta ekstreme e Spanj\u00ebs, e p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuar nga Vox, mban rreth 15% t\u00eb vendeve n\u00eb parlament, nj\u00eb p\u00ebrqindje e ngjashme me at\u00eb t\u00eb RN (Rassemblement National – Tubimit Komb\u00ebtar) n\u00eb Franc\u00eb.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb Belgjik\u00eb, partia nacionaliste Vlaams Belang, n\u00eb “peshoren politike” aktualisht peshon 12%, nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb Gjermani AfD ka r\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb 11% pas humbjes s\u00eb 11 vendeve n\u00eb zgjedhjet federale t\u00eb v. 2021.<\/p>\n

Partit\u00eb e cituara n\u00eb grafik\u00ebn ndajn\u00eb ideologji t\u00eb ngjashme mbi nacionalizmin, konservatorizmin social dhe anti-imigracionin, konsiderohen si e djatht\u00eb ekstreme e spektrit politik n\u00eb Evrop\u00eb.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

(S. Guraziu – G 22, Koment, dhe infografik\u00eb nga Anna Fleck – Statista, Q 2022) (…Wilders si “partiak” i vet\u00ebm, si nj\u00eb kacagjel politik ia b\u00ebn “kikirikuuuu” me 17 oktava t\u00eb “partis\u00eb fantomike”…) N\u00eb zgjedhjet holandeze t\u00eb v. 2021, n\u00eb… Lexo →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10505","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-komente"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10505","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10505"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10505\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10505"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10505"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10505"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}