{"id":18145,"date":"2025-07-06T22:00:32","date_gmt":"2025-07-06T21:00:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/?p=18145"},"modified":"2025-07-07T15:25:42","modified_gmt":"2025-07-07T14:25:42","slug":"trump-kaligula-adhokracia-byrokracia-autokracia-etj-pjesa-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/?p=18145","title":{"rendered":"Trump, Kaligula + Adhokracia, Byrokracia, Autokracia etj. (Pjesa 1)"},"content":{"rendered":"

(senad guraziu – ars poetica, korrik 2025)<\/em><\/p>\n

…”analfabet\u00ebt e shek. XXI nuk do jen\u00eb ata q\u00eb s’din\u00eb shkrim-lexim, por ata q\u00eb s’mund t\u00eb m\u00ebsojn\u00eb, t\u00eb \u00e7m\u00ebsojn\u00eb dhe t\u00eb rim\u00ebsojn\u00eb<\/strong>” – Alvin Toffler (1928-2016)<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

***
\nEdhe pse e kemi fjal\u00ebn p\u00ebr politikat, megjithat\u00eb le t’ia fillojm\u00eb fare “jasht\u00eb” politikave. Gjith\u00e7ka e universit pakashum\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb di\u00e7 si “p\u00ebrzierje” elementesh kimike, ashtu jemi dhe ne vet\u00eb si krijesa (ne vet\u00eb si njer\u00ebz ~70% jemi uj\u00eb etj etj. Jemi di\u00e7 si lloj-lloj \u00e7udirash kimike b\u00ebr\u00eb bashk\u00eb (sidomos karboni i paz\u00ebvend\u00ebsuesh\u00ebm, \u00ebsht\u00eb di\u00e7 si “mielli p\u00ebr buk\u00ebn”). Shkurt, jemi di\u00e7 si “kryq\u00ebzime” organike + inorganike, dhe s’duhet harruar rreth ~70% uj\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Apo si\u00e7 e dim\u00eb Gregor Mendel konsiderohet “babai”, themeluesi i gjenetik\u00ebs moderne, pik\u00ebrisht duke iu fal\u00ebnderuar eksperimenteve me “kryq\u00ebzimet”. I kryq\u00ebzonte bim\u00ebt n\u00eb kopshtin e vet, jo trangujt, s’i pati vajtur mendja, por i pati studiuar bizelet i pati b\u00ebr\u00eb “uj\u00eb”. Shkurt, fal\u00eb kryq\u00ebzimeve, tashm\u00eb me plot t\u00eb drejt\u00eb “baba i gjenetik\u00ebs”!<\/p>\n

Apo, bie fjala, n\u00ebse t’i kryq\u00ebzonim ca ingrediente t\u00eb \u00ebmbla – meq\u00eb ra fjala, pak mjalt\u00eb, qum\u00ebsht, sheqer, \u00e7okollat\u00eb, vez\u00eb etj… ku ta dim\u00eb tani si b\u00ebhen tortet – por do e kishim 1 torte fort t\u00eb shijshme, njami-njami. Rishtas, imagjino n\u00ebse t’i kryq\u00ebzonim 1 luan, 1 gjarp\u00ebr, 1 ujk, 1 drangua a kul\u00e7ed\u00ebr… 1 di\u00e7 tjet\u00ebr, ku ta dim\u00eb tani \u00e7far\u00eb tjet\u00ebr, do e kishim mbase 1 Kimera, nj\u00eb p\u00ebrbind\u00ebsh t\u00eb mitologjis\u00eb, mos pyet, jasht\u00ebzakonisht t\u00eb llahtarsh\u00ebm. Shpesh n\u00eb mitologji ashtu ia b\u00ebnin, merreshin me lloj-lloj eksperimentesh.<\/p>\n

Andaj pse t’mos “kryq\u00ebzohen” gj\u00ebrat dhe n\u00eb politikat, pse t’mos eksperimentohet me gjith\u00e7ka t\u00eb mundshme + t\u00eb pamundshme nga spektri i shkencave sociale. Psh. p\u00ebr t’i kuptuar ca gj\u00ebra t\u00eb pasqarueshme mjaftuesh\u00ebm deri tani (q\u00eb s’dihet shum\u00eb p\u00ebr to), ekspert\u00ebt dhe studiuesit e adhokracis\u00eb sugjerojn\u00eb p\u00ebr modelin q\u00eb i bashkon adhokracin\u00eb + byrokracin\u00eb = (p\u00ebr ta patur) byro-adhokracin\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Mir\u00ebpo imagjino, \u00e7far\u00eb n\u00ebse t’i kryq\u00ebzonim 3 k\u00ebso \u00e7udirash, n\u00ebse adhokracis\u00eb + byrokracis\u00eb t’ia shtonim dhe autokracin\u00eb. Dmth. adhokracia + byrokracia + autokracia = baraz me \u00e7far\u00eb? S’e kemi iden\u00eb me \u00e7far\u00eb barazohet, sepse me k\u00ebt\u00eb kryq\u00ebzim-eksperiment ende s’\u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb kush, thjesht si eksperiment ideatik, ideja jon\u00eb shakalogjike ishte e 1-ra.<\/p>\n

Por e dim\u00eb q\u00eb dhe vet\u00ebm autokracia fillikat, mozomokeq, aspak mir\u00eb, apo jo. E dim\u00eb se \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb form\u00eb qeverisjeje n\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn pushteti absolut mbahet nga kreu i shtetit dhe, apo i qeveris\u00eb, 1 kok\u00eb e vetme vendos p\u00ebr gjith\u00e7ka, 1 person, i njohur si autokrat. E dim\u00eb se autokracia i p\u00ebrfshin disa nga format e monarkis\u00eb (pothuaj t\u00eb gjitha), dhe t\u00eb gjitha format e diktatur\u00ebs, pa p\u00ebrjashtime.<\/p>\n

***
\nN\u00ebse e keni v\u00ebrejtur (apo m\u00eb mir\u00eb, vall\u00eb kush s’e ka v\u00ebrejtur, q\u00ebkur madje dhe un\u00eb e kam v\u00ebrejtur, ndoshta dhe f\u00ebmij\u00ebt e kan\u00eb v\u00ebrejtur, aq e leht\u00eb t\u00eb “vihet re”) sidomos nga fillimi i 2025 e k\u00ebndej – dmth. duke e l\u00ebn\u00eb fare mandatin e par\u00eb, s’na duhet gj\u00eb, Presidenti Trump kurr\u00eb s’i thot\u00eb gj\u00ebrat qart\u00eb. Jo “paqart\u00ebsi” n\u00eb kuptimin se gjoja fjalori politik dhe formulimet retorike t\u00eb tij na qenkan mos pyet, tejet t\u00eb avancuara. Vet\u00ebm diplomat\u00ebt e rryer ia dilkan ta kuptojn\u00eb direkt – p\u00ebrndryshe askush. Paqart\u00ebsia e tij \u00ebsht\u00eb ndryshe, dhe e q\u00ebllimshme. Aq shpesh k\u00ebrcen madje nga “k\u00ebtu” hooop fare diku “tjet\u00ebr”. Aq shpesh, fjal\u00ebt e tij nuk e “p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb” ndonj\u00eb fjali t\u00eb plot\u00eb, ngelin gjysmake… sepse sakaq i shkrep “ideja” diku tjet\u00ebr dhe hooop k\u00ebrcen si ndonj\u00eb palabra-kanguru (palabra nuk mendova pollavra, por dmth. fjal\u00eb=palabra, spanjisht : )<\/p>\n

N\u00eb rastet tjera, ca gj\u00ebra aty-k\u00ebtu thuase i sqaron me gjuh\u00ebn e kalamajve, madje i p\u00ebrs\u00ebrit, i rip\u00ebrs\u00ebrit aq sa b\u00ebhet bajat, i teket ashtu, si \u00e7ekan i “drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb” buuum fare n\u00eb thelb, me dy fjal\u00eb shkurt e tro\u00e7. Dhe bukur kjo, sepse tekefundit e kemi qart\u00ebsin\u00eb, s’ka asgj\u00eb m\u00eb bukur sesa qart\u00ebsia kristal. Fjal\u00ebt e v\u00ebrteta dhe g\u00ebnjeshtrat, e dim\u00eb se kan\u00eb dallim – por nuk e pat\u00ebm fjal\u00ebn aty, na p\u00eblqejn\u00eb madje dhe g\u00ebnjeshtrat e politikan\u00ebve, me kusht q\u00eb t’jen\u00eb t\u00eb qarta, kristal. Pa\u00e7ka se dhe k\u00ebto huje t\u00eb tro\u00e7\u00ebsis\u00eb, m\u00eb shum\u00eb jan\u00eb di\u00e7 si reflekse t\u00eb ego-arroganc\u00ebs s\u00eb tij (thuase i kan\u00eb ngelur ca vese q\u00eb nga kur merrej me “TV-aprendizat”… shkurt e tro\u00e7, “you’re fired” – “I’m the TV-dragon, and this is my fire” : )<\/p>\n

Sa her\u00eb i p\u00eblqen, sa her\u00eb i teket ndryshe, ofron thjesht abstraksione, s’ka qart\u00ebsi n\u00eb fjal\u00ebt e tij, p\u00ebrve\u00e7 di\u00e7 si “probabilitet” t\u00eb \u00e7uditsh\u00ebm. As konciz, as i qart\u00eb, p\u00ebrkundrazi, impenjohet q\u00eb t’jet\u00eb sa m\u00eb konfuz dhe i paqart\u00eb. Askush s’e ka iden\u00eb se \u00e7far\u00eb “tha mir\u00ebfilli”, sapo e tha, e d\u00ebgjuam t\u00eb gjith\u00eb, vesh\u00ebt e mpreht\u00eb, kamerat e in\u00e7izuan korrekt\u00eb, por ec e merre vesh \u00e7far\u00eb tha. Gazetar\u00ebt e ngrat\u00eb sh\u00ebnojn\u00eb n\u00eb bllokun e tyre sepse e din\u00eb (jan\u00eb m\u00ebsuar tashm\u00eb), patjet\u00ebr do raportojm\u00eb, p\u00ebr at\u00eb pun\u00eb paguhemi, edhe pse s’e kemi iden\u00eb sot. Mir\u00ebpo do jet\u00eb di\u00e7 si “kod”, q\u00eb lidhet me ndonj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr “kod” t\u00eb s\u00eb nes\u00ebrmes.<\/p>\n

Kur ndonj\u00ebra nga pyetjet e rastit i p\u00eblqen, apo n\u00ebse p\u00ebrputhet me gj\u00ebrat q\u00eb ai vet\u00eb i ka p\u00ebr qejf, flet madje dhe gjysm\u00eb ore, nuk ndalet, vazhdon e vazhdon, ku hyn e ku del, s’di t\u00eb ndalur me ego-lavdin\u00eb. Nga ndonj\u00eb aso pyetje “djeg\u00ebse… spec” sakaq ngryset, pa nj\u00eb pa dy revanshohet me sarkazmin e verdh\u00eb si flok\u00ebt e vet, i p\u00ebrbuz, i diskrediton gazetar\u00ebt, pa p\u00ebrjashtime. Mir\u00ebpo, n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsi, edhe kur p\u00ebrgjigjet, n\u00ebse b\u00ebhet fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb “ardhmen”, p\u00ebr t\u00eb “nes\u00ebrmen”, n\u00ebse pyetja lidhet me veprimet a vendimet q\u00eb do vijn\u00eb… pothuaj gjith\u00e7ka q\u00eb thot\u00eb, ngelet e paqart\u00eb, “abstraksion a la trumpistik” (po e quaj ashtu : ) sepse s’ka strategji koherente, asgj\u00eb t\u00eb “kornizuar”…<\/p>\n

Le ta ilustrojm\u00eb psh. me rastin pak koh\u00eb para bombardimit t\u00eb Iranit (q\u00eb duhej t’i hidhte ato bombat penetruese t\u00eb bjeshk\u00ebve), iku nga samiti n\u00eb Kanada papritmas, parakohsh\u00ebm, p\u00ebr t’u kthyer n\u00eb ShBA, p\u00ebr “t’u marr\u00eb me \u00e7\u00ebshtje emergjente” n\u00eb Sht\u00ebpin\u00eb e Vet, rreth sulmeve ping-pong izraelite-iraniane me raketat. Mediat vlonin gjithandej, 1 milion e 1 pyetje ia shtronin gazetar\u00ebt, reporter\u00ebt, mediat komplet, por ai si nj\u00eb \u00e7ukapikth, \u00e7ak k\u00ebtu, \u00e7uk atje, \u00e7uk andej, \u00e7ak k\u00ebndej… sorry u thoshte, \u00e7far\u00eb do b\u00ebj e di vet\u00ebm un\u00eb. Apo m\u00eb sakt\u00eb, dhe n\u00eb fakt, s’e dinte as ai vet\u00eb, sepse s’kishte si ta dinte, sepse ashtu funksionon mendja e tij, q\u00ebkur dhe n\u00eb sekond\u00ebn e fundit mund ta ndryshonte mendjen.<\/p>\n

Dmth. mend\u00ebsi “ad hoc”, psikologjisje “ad hoc”, vendime “ad hoc”, veprime “ad hoc”, gjith\u00e7ka “ad hoc”… pakashum\u00eb sipas ides\u00eb shohim e b\u00ebjm\u00eb, nuk shohim dhe b\u00ebjm\u00eb, shohim dhe nuk b\u00ebjm\u00eb (apo b\u00ebjm\u00eb – ju s’keni si ta dini), b\u00ebjm\u00eb-b\u00ebjm\u00eb pastaj shohim dhe rishtas b\u00ebjm\u00eb e k\u00ebshtu pafund\u00ebsisht : )<\/p>\n

***
\nE dim\u00eb se \u00ebsht\u00eb di\u00e7 komplekse, por \u00e7’\u00ebsht\u00eb adhokracia – si ta rrumbullak\u00ebsojm\u00eb m\u00eb s\u00eb thjeshti, si ta kthejm\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb “ameb\u00eb” t\u00eb kuptimt\u00eb?
\nN\u00ebse t\u00eb thoshim shkurt, wikipedia = adhokracia, do ishte mjaft e sakt\u00eb – sipas meje mjaft e q\u00eblluar v\u00ebrejtja e akademik\u00ebve se institucioni modern internetik Wikipedia \u00ebsht\u00eb di\u00e7 si nj\u00eb adhokraci, si nj\u00eb shembull tipik i adhokracis\u00eb moderne. Vet\u00eb si joekspert, pavar\u00ebsisht se nuk m\u00eb pyet kush, pajtohem pa ndonj\u00eb hezitim me v\u00ebrejtjen e akademik\u00ebve : )<\/p>\n

P\u00ebrndryshe ia thuhet se adhokracia \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb form\u00eb e organizimit elastik, super-elastik, pothuaj amorfik, pothuaj nj\u00ebsoj si\u00e7 \u00ebsht\u00eb e adaptueshme “ngjyr\u00ebsia” kameleonike, organizim i adaptuesh\u00ebm dhe informal. Dhe pra meq\u00eb i p\u00ebrcaktuar nga mungesa e struktur\u00ebs formale, organizmi i till\u00eb angazhon nj\u00ebsi (pune) apo ekipe t\u00eb specializuara multidisiplinare, grupuar sipas funksionit. Ves tipik wikipedia-tik, apo jo, p\u00ebrputhet super me definicionin… mir\u00ebpo neve na duhet m\u00eb shum\u00eb aspekti politik, jemi duke provuar p\u00ebr ta “kornizuar” trumpizmin si shembull i adhokracic\u00eb politike.<\/p>\n

Adhokracia \u00ebsht\u00eb di\u00e7 si sistem i sjelljes adaptive, kreative, integruese, pothuaj si veset e “virus\u00ebve” q\u00eb pritet t\u00eb adaptohen spontanisht me cilindo ambient a rrethan\u00eb, sado “armiq\u00ebsor” t’jet\u00eb ambienti i ri, virus\u00ebt \u00ebsht\u00eb supozuar t’ia dalin t\u00eb mbijetojn\u00eb. Adhokracia \u00ebsht\u00eb fleksibilitet i bazuar n\u00eb jop\u00ebrhershm\u00ebri dhe spontanitet. Mendohet se t\u00eb tilla karakteristika ia lejojn\u00eb adhokracis\u00eb t’u p\u00ebrgjigjet “rrethanave” m\u00eb shpejt se organizmat tradicional\u00eb burokratik, andaj dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb sistem m\u00eb i hapur ndaj ideve t\u00eb reja.<\/p>\n

P\u00ebr t’funksionuar, adhokracia vepron n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt me byrokracin\u00eb. Hm, n\u00eb dukje bukur por s’duhet ngutur, n\u00eb dukje sikur ting\u00ebllon “\u00ebmb\u00ebl”, di\u00e7 pozitive, ting\u00ebllon pozitivisht sepse e “kund\u00ebrshtuaka… n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt me byrokracin\u00eb”. Ose tekefundit adhokracia “ndryshe” nga byrokracia, sakaq sikur pandehim jo medoemos duhet menduar keq, jemi pozitiv\u00eb dhe duhet pozitivitet, ndoshta sadopak m\u00eb mir\u00eb do jet\u00eb, q\u00ebkur e dim\u00eb byrokracia kurr\u00eb mir\u00eb, gjithmon\u00eb ta shpif.<\/p>\n

Po ashtu, termi “adhokraci” na shtyn\u00eb t\u00eb mendojm\u00eb dhe rreth etimologjis\u00eb, sepse mjaft fjal\u00eb e “\u00e7uditshme”. Termi \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb kombinim heteroklitik i dy fjal\u00ebve, di\u00e7 si ‘portmanteau’ i termit nga latinishtja ‘ad hoc’ (q\u00eb n\u00ebnkupton ‘p\u00ebr q\u00ebllim, p\u00ebr rastin, p\u00ebr q\u00ebllim t\u00eb k\u00ebtij rasti’ – t\u00eb cilin e p\u00ebrdorim aq shpesh, apo jo, ashtu si\u00e7 \u00ebsht\u00eb, ad hoc), si dhe i prapashtes\u00ebs -kraci, e q\u00eb vjen nga greqishtja e lasht\u00eb (kratein) dhe do t’thot\u00eb “t\u00eb qeveris\u00ebsh”. Dyzim-portmanteau ngjash\u00ebm si\u00e7 dhe termi ‘demokraci” por n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast ngjiten 1 fjal\u00eb e latinishtes dhe 1 tjet\u00ebr e greqishtes, andaj dhe paksa term heteroklitik, sepse sikur nuk i “p\u00ebrfill” ca rregullore t\u00eb kombinimit t\u00eb termave.<\/p>\n

Thuhet se termin e pati ‘farkuar’, e pati p\u00ebrdorur p\u00ebr her\u00eb t\u00eb par\u00eb Warren Bennis, n\u00eb nj\u00eb lib\u00ebr t\u00eb vetin, n\u00eb v. 1968. Pastaj, vet\u00ebm 2 vite m\u00eb von\u00eb, autori Alvin Toffler (1928-2016) e popullarizoi termin, n\u00eb librin e tij “Future Shock” (nuk di n\u00ebse, dhe si \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrkthyer n\u00eb shqip – ashtu si p\u00ebrkthim i lir\u00eb, Tronditja e Ardhm\u00ebris\u00eb), n\u00eb v. 1970.
\nN\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb lib\u00ebr (anise ishte dhe dikush tjet\u00ebr, ishte bashkautor\u00ebsi) Toffler e p\u00ebrcaktoi termin “tronditje e ardhm\u00ebris\u00eb”. Sipas tij di\u00e7 si gjendje kjo e caktuar psikologjike, si p\u00ebrceptim personal i individ\u00ebve dhe i shoq\u00ebrive t\u00eb t\u00ebra, ardhur p\u00ebr arsye t\u00eb “ndryshimit t\u00eb tep\u00ebrt, n\u00eb nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb tep\u00ebr t\u00eb shkurt\u00ebr kohore”. Q\u00eb at\u00ebher\u00eb termi \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur n\u00eb teorin\u00eb e menaxhimit (t\u00eb organizatave), e po ashtu si koncept termi ‘adhokraci’ do zhvillohej m\u00eb tej nga akademik\u00eb si Henry Mintzberg, Robert Waterman etj.<\/p>\n

Ndaras kga kjo, pa u shmangur aq nga tema, po e cek\u00eb se nj\u00eb th\u00ebnie e autorit Toffler, ca vite m\u00eb par\u00eb pothuaj sa nuk e pati “fituar” favorizimin tim, dmth. t’b\u00ebhej citati m\u00eb i men\u00e7ur, m\u00eb favorit i t\u00eb gjitha koh\u00ebrave – sepse v\u00ebrtet ende s’e kam zgjedhur th\u00ebnien “favorite”, pothuaj gjithkush do e ket\u00eb ndonj\u00eb t\u00eb “zgjedhur” un\u00eb jo, ende s’kam as t\u00eb dashur “favorite” (si\u00e7 i kishin pashallar\u00ebt psh. Ali Pashai, apo dhe vet\u00eb Sulltani) e po ashtu ende s’kam as men\u00e7uri favorite – kjo e Toffler ishte n\u00eb buz\u00eb t\u00eb fitores : )<\/p>\n

N\u00ebse jeni kureshtar\u00eb “cila th\u00ebnie, dhe pse” – at\u00ebher\u00eb ja, do e sqaroj, th\u00ebnia e tij p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn e pata fjal\u00ebn, thot\u00eb si vijon: “analfabet\u00ebt e shek. XXI nuk do jen\u00eb ata q\u00eb s’din\u00eb shkrim-lexim, por ata q\u00eb s’mund t\u00eb m\u00ebsojn\u00eb, t\u00eb \u00e7m\u00ebsojn\u00eb dhe t\u00eb rim\u00ebsojn\u00eb”. Sipas meje men\u00e7uria e Toffler i p\u00ebrshtatet n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrkryer adhokratizmit + trumpidentizmit + shek. XXI (n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin jemi), ja pse nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb “shmangie” nga tema.<\/p>\n

Adhokracia i ka sa t\u00eb duash an\u00eb negative, sidoqoft\u00eb, ekstremizmi n\u00eb veprimet e sugjeruara, dhe t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmarra, k\u00ebrc\u00ebnimet ndaj demokracis\u00eb dhe ligjshm\u00ebris\u00eb (q\u00eb rrjedhin nga profili i adhokracis\u00eb – si\u00e7 psh. aq shpesh ndodh\u00eb n\u00eb rastin e Trump) jan\u00eb ca nga an\u00ebt negative m\u00eb t\u00eb spikatura. P\u00ebr t’i adresuar k\u00ebso probleme, ekspert\u00ebt dhe studiuesit sugjerojn\u00eb modelin q\u00eb i bashkon adhokracin\u00eb + byrokracin\u00eb = byro-adhokracin\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Thuhet se ka dy lloje t\u00eb adhokracive, nj\u00ebra duke qen\u00eb “adhokracia administrative”, i cili lloj mendohet se e “paraqet nj\u00eb b\u00ebrtham\u00eb operative autonome, zakonisht (p\u00ebr)brenda nj\u00eb burokracie t\u00eb institucionalizuar, si departament qeveritar apo dhe si ndonj\u00eb agjenci e p\u00ebrhershme”. Si dhe lloji i 2-t\u00eb i adhokracis\u00eb mendohet se b\u00ebn t\u00eb quhet di\u00e7 si “adhokraci operative”, kjo adhokraci \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb e fokusuar, m\u00eb shum\u00eb “klienteliste” i zgjidh problemet n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb klient\u00ebve t\u00eb caktuar.<\/p>\n

***
\n“Duke e p\u00ebrqafuar adhokracin\u00eb, presidenti n\u00eb detyr\u00eb ka zgjedhur nj\u00eb stil qeverisjeje q\u00eb i p\u00ebrforcon dob\u00ebsit\u00eb e tij dhe i rrit shanset p\u00ebr gabime t\u00eb m\u00ebdha – president\u00ebt anojn\u00eb kah nj\u00eb sistem q\u00eb ata duan, jo kah sistemi q\u00eb u nevojitet” – pati shkruar Richard Haass, n\u00eb v. 2017, duke aluduar dmth. n\u00eb Presidentin Trump.<\/p>\n

“Rreziqet e adhokracis\u00eb jan\u00eb t\u00eb shumta.” – vazhdon Haass – “Pasojat e zgjedhjes s\u00eb nj\u00eb opsioni t\u00eb caktuar shpesh nuk vler\u00ebsohen paraprakisht n\u00eb plot\u00ebsin\u00eb e duhur. Prioritetet as nuk vendosen as nuk mir\u00ebmbahen – kompromiset shpesh anashkalohen. Zbatimi i vendimeve b\u00ebhet sa m\u00eb shkurt (jo i plot\u00eb). \u00c7\u00ebshtjet rishikohen, jo p\u00ebr arsye t\u00eb mira, por sepse nj\u00eb dikush i caktuar nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i k\u00ebnaqur me at\u00eb q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb vendosur dhe e bind presidentin se vendimi duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbyset. Nj\u00eb sjellje e till\u00eb mund t\u00eb \u00e7oj\u00eb shpejt drejt nj\u00eb “v\u00ebrshimi” informatik. I gjith\u00eb procesi k\u00ebrkon shum\u00eb nga presidenti, i cili n\u00eb fakt vepron si kryeshef i stafit t\u00eb vet”.<\/p>\n

Q\u00eb n\u00eb hyrje t\u00eb artikullit t\u00eb vet, autori Haass e p\u00ebrdorte nj\u00eb citat nga Arthur Schlesinger (lidhur me presidentin e 32-t\u00eb t\u00eb ShBA, Franklin D. Roosevelt) “Teknika e tij e preferuar (qeveris\u00ebse) ishte t’i mbante dh\u00ebniet e autorizimeve t\u00eb paplota, juridiksionet t\u00eb pasigurta, kartelat ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebse t\u00eb “g\u00ebrshetuara” (jo t\u00eb qarta). Rezultati i k\u00ebsaj teorie konkurrim-sjell\u00ebse t\u00eb administrimit ishte shpesh konfuzion dhe acarim n\u00eb nivelin operativ.” – Schlesinger ka shkruar k\u00ebshtu p\u00ebr Presidentin Roosevelt, dhe tashm\u00eb autori Haass (ende pa e sqaruar se kend ishte duke e cituar) u thot\u00eb lexuesve n\u00ebse mendoni se kjo ishte p\u00ebr Presidentin Trump, epo do ishit gabim, jo, ishte konkluzioni i Schlesinger p\u00ebr “metodat qeveris\u00ebse” t\u00eb Roosevelt.<\/p>\n

Dhe dmth. elemente adhokratike ka patur gjithher\u00eb dhe gjithandej (donte t\u00eb thoshte autori Haass), nuk jan\u00eb “shpikur” nga administrata e Trump, si\u00e7 e dim\u00eb i p\u00ebrdornin madje dhe romak\u00ebt (psh. perandori Kaligula – k\u00ebsaj do i qasemi m\u00eb posht\u00eb, duke i sjellur ca v\u00ebshtrime t\u00eb autorit holandez, Henri van Nispen), e po ashtu njihen forma t\u00eb hibridizmit t\u00eb byrokracis\u00eb + adhokracis\u00eb = duke rezultuar n\u00eb di\u00e7 si “byro-adhokraci” (si term, q\u00eb p\u00ebrdoret gjithashtu).<\/p>\n

Tutje, autori Haass, n\u00eb artikullin e vet (2017) i pati cekur dhe detajet si vijon: “Adhokracia tenton ta n\u00ebnvizoj\u00eb pozicionin dhe autoritetin unik t\u00eb presidentit, (adhokracia) e vendos at\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb pozicion dominues ku ai mund t’i shp\u00ebrblej\u00eb an\u00ebtar\u00ebt e stafit dhe t’i penalizoj\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00ebt, por dhe t’i pozicionoj\u00eb an\u00ebtar\u00ebt e stafit kund\u00ebr nj\u00ebri-tjetrit. Adhokracia n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsi nuk zgjedhet me “vet\u00ebdije” p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb avantazheve t\u00eb saj relative, por p\u00ebrkundrazi p\u00ebrshfaqet si nj\u00eb pozicion i paracaktuar q\u00eb i pasqyron prirjet e presidentit, dhe atyre p\u00ebrreth tij |…|Administrata Trump \u00ebsht\u00eb karakterizuar nga adhokracia gjat\u00eb muajve t\u00eb saj t\u00eb par\u00eb. Iniciativa q\u00eb e kufizon imigracionin \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb shembull konkret. Politika e re (rreth emigracionit) nuk qe verifikuar plot\u00ebsisht brenda administrat\u00ebs.”<\/p>\n

***
\nAutori tjet\u00ebr, Alvin Toffler mendon se “adhokracit\u00eb do t’b\u00ebhen t\u00eb zakonshme, m\u00eb t\u00eb zakonshme (n\u00eb t\u00eb ardhmen) se \u00e7’jan\u00eb tashm\u00eb, dhe ka t\u00eb ngjar\u00eb ta z\u00ebvend\u00ebsojn\u00eb burokracin\u00eb”. Sipas Toffler, adhokracit\u00eb “m\u00eb shpesh do t’shfaqen n\u00eb form\u00ebn e nj\u00eb strukture t\u00eb p\u00ebrkohshme, formuar p\u00ebr ta zgjidhur nj\u00eb problem t\u00eb caktuar, dhe m\u00eb pas qasja adhokratike shp\u00ebrb\u00ebhet”.
\nVet\u00eb s’jam i sigurt si duhet kuptuar kjo, por n\u00ebse do ta sillnim nd\u00ebrmend DOGE (at\u00eb buj\u00ebn e madhe, n\u00ebse i kujtojm\u00eb “motosharrat” kund\u00ebr federalizmit byrokratik t\u00eb Elon Musk), dhe n\u00ebse e marrim si shembull t\u00eb nj\u00eb “task force” nd\u00ebr-departamentale, at\u00ebher\u00eb i bie se ka kuptim dhe Toffler do ket\u00eb aluduar n\u00eb k\u00ebso shembuj, “it makes sense” : ) do thosha.<\/p>\n

Ngjash\u00ebm si Toffler, edhe autori Henry Mintzberg adhokracin\u00eb e konsideron si di\u00e7 t\u00eb s\u00eb ardhmes, nd\u00ebrsa burokracin\u00eb si nj\u00eb gj\u00eb t\u00eb s\u00eb tashmes, t\u00eb s\u00eb kaluar\u00ebs. Mua vet\u00eb, sa p\u00ebr zhdukjen e byrokracis\u00eb, personalisht sikur s’ma merr mendja : ) s’m\u00eb mbushet mendja se byrokracia do zhduket ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb. Sipas meje s’ka shans, vet\u00ebm sa do b\u00ebhet m\u00eb komplekse, do ket\u00eb formash tjera, ndoshta dhe totalisht amorfike, por assesi t\u00eb “zhduket” as z\u00ebvend\u00ebsohet.<\/p>\n

P\u00ebr autorin Henry Mintzberg adhokracia \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb form\u00eb organizative komplekse dhe dinamike, kuptohet se \u00ebsht\u00eb e ndryshme nga burokracia. N\u00ebse implemtohet mir\u00eb e si\u00e7 duhet, adhokracia mund t’jet\u00eb e mir\u00eb p\u00ebr zgjidhjen e problemeve dhe mund\u00ebson q\u00eb inovacioni t\u00eb lul\u00ebzoj\u00eb n\u00eb mjedise t\u00eb larmishme. Adhokracia (e “idealit” a la Mintzberg) k\u00ebrkon sisteme teknike t\u00eb sofistikuara, dhe shpesh t\u00eb automatizuara, p\u00ebr t’u zhvilluar dhe lul\u00ebzuar.<\/p>\n

Sipas Mintzberg disa nga “karakteristikat” relevante adhokratike do ishin: struktur\u00eb sa m\u00eb shum\u00eb organike (elastike) – standardizim t\u00eb ul\u00ebt ose fare standardizim t\u00eb procedurave – specializim sa i p\u00ebrket pun\u00ebs (por jo patjet\u00ebr bazuar n\u00eb trajnim formal) – specializim horizontal i pun\u00ebs – tendenc\u00eb p\u00ebr t’i grupuar specialist\u00ebt n\u00eb nj\u00ebsi funksionale (p\u00ebr q\u00ebllime menaxheriale), tendenc\u00eb p\u00ebr t’i caktuar specialist\u00ebt e fushave t\u00eb ndryshme n\u00eb ekipe t\u00eb vogla, dhe p\u00ebr t’i koordinuar projektet e tyre nga nj\u00eb “pult” i vet\u00ebm centralist – role t\u00eb pap\u00ebrcaktuara qart\u00eb – decentralizim selektiv – kultur\u00eb e bazuar n\u00eb pun\u00eb jo-burokratike – zhvendosje t\u00eb pushtetit n\u00eb ekipet e specializuara… etj.<\/p>\n

Nd\u00ebrsa autori Robert Waterman e p\u00ebrcakton adhokracin\u00eb si “\u00e7do form\u00eb organizimi q\u00eb i tejkalon linjat normale burokratike p\u00ebr t’i kapur mund\u00ebsit\u00eb momentale, p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjidhur problemet ‘ad hoc’ dhe p\u00ebr t’i vjel\u00eb frutat, rezultatet e \u00e7astit”. V\u00ebrejtja e Waterman, pothuaj 100% tipike si p\u00ebrshkrim i veseve trumpidentike, thuase i “p\u00ebrshtatet” aq sakt\u00eb trumpidentizmit – vall\u00eb si e dinte Waterman : ) Sipas Waterman, “ekipet adhokratike duhet t’jen\u00eb mjaftuesh\u00ebm t\u00eb m\u00ebdha p\u00ebr t’i p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuar t\u00eb gjitha pjes\u00ebt e burokracis\u00eb (q\u00eb do preken nga vendimet e tyre, nga veprimet politike-adminsitrative), por megjithat\u00eb mjaftuesh\u00ebm t\u00eb vogla, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb k\u00ebto ekipe ta kryejn\u00eb pun\u00ebn me efikasitet”.<\/p>\n

***
\n[ vijon me pjes\u00ebn 2 – di\u00e7 si analiz\u00eb rreth librit t\u00eb Henri van Nispen – “Udh\u00ebheqja Adhokratike e Perandorit Kaligula”<\/em> ]<\/p>\n

Perandori romak Kaligula p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsisht konsiderohet si rast prototipik i \u00e7menduris\u00eb perandorake. Udh\u00ebheqja e tij u sh\u00ebnua me demonstrime t\u00eb fuqis\u00eb, me manipulime t\u00eb shoq\u00ebris\u00eb, me krijim t\u00eb pasiguris\u00eb… dhe me mjaft kontradikta. I karakterizuar p\u00ebr vendimmarrjet arbitrare dhe p\u00ebr ushtrimin personal t\u00eb pushtetit, perandorll\u00ebku i perandorit Kaligula nuk p\u00ebrshtatej me kontekstin unik t\u00eb sfidave t\u00eb paraqitura nga senati. P\u00ebrpjekjet e tij p\u00ebr ta konsoliduar pushtetin do \u00e7onin n\u00eb situatash konfliktuoze dhe n\u00eb fund n\u00eb vrasjen e tij. Autori van Nispen i identifikon dy faktor\u00eb kryesor\u00eb: kushtetut\u00ebn e p\u00ebrzier augustiane e cila e thekson konsensusin dhe prejardhjen e Kaligula (si fisnik, si elitar i Rom\u00ebs), t\u00eb cil\u00ebn kushtetut\u00eb ai e manipuloi p\u00ebr ta pohuar statusin e vet “hyjnor”. Nga p\u00ebrspektiva e tashme, e leht\u00eb t’na duket pothuaj qesharake, nga nj\u00ebra an\u00eb perandor dhe dmth. \u00ebsht\u00eb supozuar lidership me “mendje t\u00eb sh\u00ebndosh\u00eb”, nga ana tjet\u00ebr \u00ebsht\u00eb fakt q\u00eb Kaligula pandehte se ishte zot a hyjnor, nj\u00eb lloj “\u00e7mendurie” q\u00eb do e sillte dhe vrasjen e tij… gjithsesi, derisa narrativat konvencionale mbret\u00ebrimin e Kaligula shpesh e etiketojn\u00eb thjesht si ‘\u00e7menduri’, Van Nispen i riformulon veprimet e tij brenda kontekstit t\u00eb udh\u00ebheqjes adhokratike. Dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb vazhd\u00eb, n\u00eb librin e tij i sjell paralelizimet adhokratike “Trump – Kaligula”…<\/p>\n

| – – –
\n 
\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

(senad guraziu – ars poetica, korrik 2025) …”analfabet\u00ebt e shek. XXI nuk do jen\u00eb ata q\u00eb s’din\u00eb shkrim-lexim, por ata q\u00eb s’mund t\u00eb m\u00ebsojn\u00eb, t\u00eb \u00e7m\u00ebsojn\u00eb dhe t\u00eb rim\u00ebsojn\u00eb” – Alvin Toffler (1928-2016) *** Edhe pse e kemi fjal\u00ebn p\u00ebr… Lexo →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18145","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-komente"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18145","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18145"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18145\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18145"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18145"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18145"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}