{"id":5104,"date":"2019-12-27T16:48:18","date_gmt":"2019-12-27T15:48:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/?p=5104"},"modified":"2024-04-11T18:53:21","modified_gmt":"2024-04-11T17:53:21","slug":"anglishtimi-i-botes-gjuha-uniformale-e-globalizmit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/?p=5104","title":{"rendered":"“Anglishtimi” i Bot\u00ebs – Gjuha Uniformale e Globalizmit!"},"content":{"rendered":"

S. Guraziu – Ars Poetica, Dhjetor 2019 (P\u00ebrsiatje<\/em> – “Save” (Ruaj) pjes\u00ebt integrale t\u00eb Identitetit Komb\u00ebtar<\/strong>)<\/p>\n

N\u00eb dekadat e fundit, n\u00eb shum\u00eb fusha k\u00ebrkimore anglishtja \u00ebsht\u00eb zhvilluar n\u00eb nj\u00eb “Lingua franca” – thon\u00eb holandez\u00ebt, ky zhvillim ka avantazhe n\u00eb frym\u00ebn e orientimit nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar (ose “globalistik”) t\u00eb Holand\u00ebs<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

N\u00eb v. 2003, Akademia Mbret\u00ebrore e Arteve dhe Shkencave (KNAW) e pati publikuar raportin “Nederlands, tenzij…” (Holandisht, p\u00ebrve\u00e7 n\u00ebse…) me t\u00eb cilin raport b\u00ebhej e qart\u00eb se “jo Anglishta, por Holandishtja duhet t’jet\u00eb dhe t\u00eb ruhet si gjuh\u00eb shkencore e institucioneve dhe universiteteve”.
\nKy raport k\u00ebshillimor i p\u00ebrpiluar nga “Komisioni Holandishtja si Gjuh\u00eb Shkencore” p\u00ebrmbante rekomandime p\u00ebr ruajtjen e Holandishtes. Komisioni ishte i mendimit se Holandishtja e meritonte mbrojtjen institucionale, nga institucionet t\u00eb cilat dhe mbajn\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb, n\u00eb radh\u00eb t\u00eb par\u00eb nga qeveria, por dhe nga universitetet si bart\u00ebs t\u00eb kultur\u00ebs q\u00eb jan\u00eb, e k\u00ebshtusoj dhe t\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs.<\/p>\n

Vet\u00ebm 14 vjet m\u00eb pas, n\u00eb v. 2017 e nj\u00ebjta Akademi (KNAW) i “h\u00ebngri fjal\u00ebt e veta”, publikut holandez iu prezantua raporti “Hollandisht dhe \/ ose Anglisht”, n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin raport thjesht pranohet q\u00eb Holandishtja dhe Anglishtja n\u00eb arsimin e lart\u00eb dhe shkencor t\u00eb Holand\u00ebs tashm\u00eb ve\u00e7 “bashk\u00ebjetojn\u00eb” (pra martes\u00eb s’\u00ebsht\u00eb nevoja, ama nj\u00ebfar\u00eblloj “bashk\u00ebjetese”). Pa\u00e7ka se dihet q\u00eb Anglishtja n\u00eb fakt, p\u00ebr nj\u00eb koh\u00eb t\u00eb gjat\u00eb tashm\u00eb ve\u00e7 \u00ebsht\u00eb duke luajtur rolin kryesor.<\/p>\n

Vall\u00eb “aq shum\u00eb mund t\u00eb ndryshojn\u00eb gj\u00ebrat n\u00eb vet\u00ebm 14 vjet”- e kishte shprehur habin\u00eb Andr\u00e9 Keikes n\u00eb shkrimin e vet, 2018, n\u00eb “fryslan1\/frl”, me titull ironik “Mund t’b\u00ebhet “Save” Frizishtja dhe Holandishtja?”! Ai vazhdon tutje duke na i b\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb qarta hujet e “anglishtimit”…<\/p>\n

“Francez\u00ebt, dikur p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsues t\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs s\u00eb fuqishme t\u00eb elit\u00ebs, po b\u00ebjn\u00eb gjith\u00e7ka brenda mund\u00ebsive t\u00eb veta p\u00ebr t’vazhduar ta “ruajn\u00eb” r\u00ebnd\u00ebsin\u00eb e Fr\u00ebngjishtes nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare (TV5 Monde), por me gjas\u00eb asgj\u00eb s’mund t’i b\u00ebj\u00eb ball\u00eb “anglishtimit”. Jo vet\u00ebm francez\u00ebt, edhe spanjoll\u00ebt, italian\u00ebt, gjerman\u00ebt… madje dhe vet\u00eb kinez\u00ebt tani flasin anglisht. Zhvendosja drejt anglishtes \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb prej koh\u00ebsh n\u00ebp\u00ebr kolegjet dhe universitetet kineze. Edhe pse zyrtarisht gjuha m\u00eb e madhe e bot\u00ebs, e folur nga 850 milion\u00eb kinez\u00eb, ata sikur jan\u00eb vet\u00ebdij\u00ebsuar se p\u00ebrjashta Kin\u00ebs pak arrihet me kinezishten. N\u00eb lidhje me k\u00ebt\u00eb, e nj\u00ebjta mund t\u00eb thuhet dhe p\u00ebr frizishten e holandishten.”<\/p>\n

“N\u00ebse e kujtojm\u00eb Frislanden e viteve ’50 (t\u00eb shek. t\u00eb kaluar), pothuajse gjith\u00e7ka ishte akoma e p\u00ebrqendruar rajonalisht. Ishin kompanit\u00eb lokale t\u00eb energjis\u00eb, kompanit\u00eb e ujit e t\u00eb telefonis\u00eb dhe dyqanet furnizoheshin nga prodhuesit e zon\u00ebs, Frislanda si provinc\u00eb e kishte nj\u00eb ekonomi plot\u00ebsisht t\u00eb menaxhueshme. Praktikisht asgj\u00eb s’duhej sjellur nga vendet e tjera t\u00eb bot\u00ebs me avion\u00ebt ndot\u00ebs ose me anijet plot me kontejner\u00eb. Mir\u00ebpo, nga ana tjet\u00ebr nuk ishin as dyqanet e llojit “Action”, ku sot mund t’i mbushni plast-shportat me lloj-lloj artikuj “made in China”. Gjith\u00e7ka q\u00eb sot e gjeni dhe e bleni “online” (n\u00ebp\u00ebr dyqanet internetike) praktikisht mund t’jen\u00eb artikuj prodhuar kudo, n\u00eb ak\u00ebcilin skaj t\u00eb bot\u00ebs.”<\/p>\n

Nd\u00ebrsa vet\u00eb Akademia Mbret\u00ebrore e Arteve dhe Shkencave (KNAW); n\u00eb parath\u00ebnien e raportit t\u00eb 2017, nga pres. J. van Dijck thuhet:
\n“N\u00eb dekadat e fundit, n\u00eb shum\u00eb fusha k\u00ebrkimore anglishtja \u00ebsht\u00eb zhvilluar n\u00eb nj\u00eb “Lingua franca”, kjo gjithashtu vlen gjithnj\u00eb e m\u00eb shum\u00eb dhe p\u00ebr arsimin e lart\u00eb. Ky zhvillim ka avantazhe n\u00eb frym\u00ebn e orientimit nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Holland\u00ebs, e gjithashtu duket se ka nj\u00eb ndikim t\u00eb favorsh\u00ebm n\u00eb cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e arsimit. Nga ana tjet\u00ebr jan\u00eb shfaqur trazira n\u00eb sektor\u00eb t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb rreth fenomenit t\u00eb ashtuquajtur “anglishtim”: ndikimi i mpreht\u00eb n\u00eb rritje i arsimit n\u00eb gjuh\u00ebn angleze n\u00ebp\u00ebr trajnime dhe n\u00eb menaxhimin e institucioneve. Jan\u00eb organizuar takime brenda dhe jasht\u00eb kolegjeve e universiteteve, dhe ka patur debate t\u00eb forta n\u00eb politik\u00eb dhe n\u00eb media. Parlamenti e ka shqyrtuar disa her\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje… Koh\u00ebt e fundit, nj\u00eb grup veprimtar\u00ebsh madje pati k\u00ebrc\u00ebnuar me nj\u00eb padi kund\u00ebr t\u00eb ashtuquajturit “anglishtim”. Ky debat vazhdon p\u00ebr vite me radh\u00eb. S’\u00ebsht\u00eb as p\u00ebr t’u habitur, n\u00eb thelb b\u00ebhet fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr vlerat e gjuh\u00ebs dhe t\u00eb kultur\u00ebs holandeze. Ministri i Arsimit, Kultur\u00ebs dhe Shkenc\u00ebs ka deklaruar se Holanda aktualisht \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb udh\u00ebkryq t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm me debatin p\u00ebr politik\u00ebn gjuh\u00ebsore. Nga nj\u00ebra an\u00eb, njihet r\u00ebnd\u00ebsia e madhe e nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtarizimit t\u00eb arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb p\u00ebr Holand\u00ebn, por nga ana tjet\u00ebr nuk mohohet shqet\u00ebsimi p\u00ebr brengat e lartp\u00ebrmendura. ”<\/p>\n

***
\nZhvillimet n\u00eb 10-vje\u00e7arin e fundit sa i p\u00ebrket gjuh\u00ebs n\u00eb sektorin e arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb dhe atij universitar holandez (kuptohet zhvillime k\u00ebto p\u00ebr t’ngelur n\u00eb “hap me hapin”, p\u00ebr ta ndjekur hapin e globalizmit), ndoshta duhet par\u00eb dhe si “zile alarmi” p\u00ebr ta ruajtur me \u00e7do kusht Gegnishten, Tosk\u00ebrishten, Shqipen e vog\u00ebl (n\u00eb krahasim me Kinezishten e madhe, me Anglishten)… sikur dhe Frizishten e vog\u00ebl.<\/p>\n

Jo vet\u00ebm par\u00eb nga aspekti i “krenaris\u00eb”, as si shtytje par\u00ebsore p\u00ebr ta ruajtur amz\u00ebn gjuh\u00ebsore (kjo dhe s’mund t\u00eb tjet\u00ebrsohet assesi, pasi n\u00eb radh\u00eb t\u00eb par\u00eb jan\u00eb impulse natyrale t\u00eb mbijetes\u00ebs) por edhe sepse bota e globalizuar e qart\u00eb se do jet\u00eb totalisht “uniforme”, bajate… monotone!<\/p>\n

Vall\u00eb, p\u00ebrndryshe what’s the point… t\u00eb anglishtohet gjith\u00e7ka, ku do ngelej bukuria dhe dometh\u00ebnia e asaj premises “dallimisht nj\u00ebsoj”, ku do ngeleje bukuria e laryshis\u00eb kulturore n\u00ebse t\u00eb gjith\u00eb frymor\u00ebt e planetit t\u00eb flisnin Kinezisht? Desha ta prek dhe nj\u00eb shembull tjet\u00ebr – vall\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb kuptimi na paska Konventa e Trash\u00ebgimis\u00eb Kulturore e ratifikuar nga 191 vende t\u00eb bot\u00ebs, kur rrotull UNESCO ashtu-k\u00ebshtu v\u00ebrtiten 197 vende (bota nuk i ka 699, as 991 shtete)?!<\/p>\n

Kahdo t\u00eb rrotullohemi e kemi fjal\u00ebn p\u00ebr “globalizmin”. UNESCO n\u00eb faqen zyrtare (e qart\u00eb, dmth. e gjith\u00eb bota, UNESCO \u00ebsht\u00eb institucion global – 191 vende) thot\u00eb se \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb aq shum\u00eb, se trash\u00ebgimia materiale e kulturore p\u00ebrb\u00ebhet nga 1121 “pika mbrojtjeje” t\u00eb trash\u00ebgimis\u00eb s\u00eb njer\u00ebzimit, shp\u00ebrndar aneskaj globit, n\u00eb 167 vende t\u00eb ndryshme.
\n\u00cbsht\u00eb aq bukur n\u00ebse b\u00ebhet di\u00e7 p\u00ebr mbrojtjen e trash\u00ebgimis\u00eb s\u00eb njer\u00ebzimit. Nga k\u00ebto 1121 “pika” t\u00eb krenaris\u00eb, 868 jan\u00eb mbrojtje t\u00eb trash\u00ebgimis\u00eb kulturore, 213 aso t\u00eb trash\u00ebgimis\u00eb natyrore dhe 39 aso t\u00eb trash\u00ebgimis\u00eb s\u00eb p\u00ebrzier (di\u00e7 si kombinim i t\u00eb dyjave).
\n5 vendet e bot\u00ebs me m\u00eb shum\u00eb “mbrojtje” t\u00eb trash\u00ebgimis\u00eb jan\u00eb Italia (55), Kina (55), Spanja (48), Gjermania (46) dhe Franca (45).<\/p>\n

P\u00ebrve\u00e7 lokacioneve hedhur n\u00eb List\u00ebn e Mbrojtjes, UNESCO e mbron dhe Memorien Historike t\u00eb Njer\u00ebzimit (Dokumentet), si dhe po ashtu UNESCO ka List\u00ebn e Trash\u00ebgimis\u00eb s\u00eb Kultur\u00ebs s\u00eb Paprekshme. Derisa n\u00eb list\u00ebn e mbrojtjes s\u00eb trash\u00ebgimis\u00eb Shqip\u00ebria deri tani i ka 4-5 lokacione t\u00eb regjistruara (3 kulturore, dhe 2 natyrore), p\u00ebrve\u00e7 k\u00ebtyre Trash\u00ebgimia e Kultur\u00ebs s\u00eb Paprekshme e UNESCO e mbron bie fjala dhe Iso-Polifonin\u00eb Shqiptare.<\/p>\n

T\u00eb kat\u00ebr rajonet e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb Jugut (Lal\u00ebria – Myzeqeja, Tosk\u00ebria, \u00c7am\u00ebria dhe Lab\u00ebria) i kan\u00eb k\u00ebng\u00ebt polifonike si pjes\u00eb e kultur\u00ebs s\u00eb tyre. Anise nj\u00eb form\u00eb e ngjashme e k\u00ebng\u00ebtimit polifonik \u00ebsht\u00eb identifikuar edhe n\u00eb veri t\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb – sqaron UNESCO.
\nN\u00eb rregull, dialekti i Lab\u00ebris\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb dialekti Lab, i cili \u00ebsht\u00eb i ve\u00e7ant\u00eb p\u00ebr rajonin, apo jo. Dmth. e natyrshme q\u00eb Lab\u00ebt polifonin\u00eb e tyre do ta ushtrojn\u00eb “lab\u00ebrisht”, ata s’do k\u00ebndojn\u00eb as Kinezisht as Anglisht n\u00ebp\u00ebr festivalet e tradit\u00ebs polifonike, q\u00eb nga 1968-a.<\/p>\n

Po ashtu dihet q\u00eb muzika, qoft\u00eb e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb apo e kujtdo vend, \u00ebsht\u00eb pjes\u00eb integrale e identitetit komb\u00ebtar, nj\u00ebsoj si\u00e7 \u00ebsht\u00eb dhe gjuha, si\u00e7 jan\u00eb dhe dialektet. N\u00ebse muzika \u00ebsht\u00eb, vall\u00eb “gegnishtja” si dialekt am\u00ebsor nuk qenka “pasuri kulturore” e popullit shqiptar, pjes\u00eb integrale e identitetit komb\u00ebtar, po aq sa polifonia muzikore? Vall\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb kuptimi do kishte Iso-Polifonia n\u00ebse Lab\u00ebt t’ia krisnin Kinezisht me k\u00ebng\u00ebt e tyre, aneskaj festivaleve t\u00eb Kuqe t\u00eb Kin\u00ebs? Jo pra, lab\u00ebt e din\u00eb se polifonia e tyre ka kuptim vet\u00ebm si pjes\u00eb integrale e Identitetit shqiptar, asesi e identitetit kinez. Ruajtja e gj\u00ebrave t\u00eb zgjedhura dhe unikale t\u00eb popujve ka kuptim p\u00ebr “globalizmin”, ama ruajtja e t\u00ebr\u00ebsis\u00eb kulturore t\u00eb popujve ka “kuptim” p\u00ebr vet\u00eb popujt.<\/p>\n

Natyrisht q\u00eb UNESCO s’mund t’i ket\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha “pjes\u00ebt integrale kulturore” t\u00eb nj\u00eb populli t\u00eb mbrojtura n\u00ebp\u00ebr Listat e veta, at\u00ebher\u00eb ato e ka p\u00ebr detyr\u00eb t’i mbroj\u00eb, t’i ruaj\u00eb e t’i kultivoj\u00eb vet\u00eb populli. Tosk\u00ebt do ta ruajn\u00eb Tosk\u00ebrishten, Lab\u00ebt do ta ruajn\u00eb Lab\u00ebrishten, banor\u00ebt e Frisland\u00ebs do ta ruajn\u00eb gjuh\u00ebn amtare… do insistojn\u00eb “Frysk”, do provojn\u00eb t’i b\u00ebjn\u00eb ball\u00eb sa Holandishtes po aq dhe Kinezishtes e Anglishtes… E edhe Geg\u00ebt e kan\u00eb borxh e detyrim t\u00eb kujdesen p\u00ebr Gegnishten.<\/p>\n

Pasi skema “globalistike” e UNESCO p\u00ebr fat t\u00eb keq thjesht s’mund t’i ket\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha “pjes\u00ebt integrale kulturore” t\u00eb popujve n\u00ebp\u00ebr listat e veta. N\u00ebse di\u00e7 nuk figuron n\u00eb list\u00ebn e UNESCO s’do t’thot\u00eb se ajo di\u00e7 duhet l\u00ebn\u00eb pas dore a n\u00ebp\u00ebrk\u00ebmbur. Gegnishtja \u00ebsht\u00eb gjysma e gjuh\u00ebs s\u00eb kombit. Dialektet Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb s’hyjn\u00eb n\u00eb kriteret e UNESCO, s’hyn as krenaria “Frysk” e Frisland\u00ebs, e qart\u00eb! Por kjo s’do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se Tosk\u00ebrishtja e Gegnishtja nuk qenkan “integralitet”, pjes\u00eb integrale t\u00eb identitetit shqiptar. N\u00ebse Gj\u00ebma (Gjama, Vajtimi) i malsor\u00ebve ende s’qenka n\u00eb List\u00ebn e Kultur\u00ebs s\u00eb Paprekshme t\u00eb UNESCO, fare leht\u00eb nes\u00ebr mund t’jet\u00eb… nj\u00ebsoj si Iso-Polifonia.
\nDeri at\u00ebher\u00eb, p\u00ebr gjith\u00e7ka t\u00eb Identitetit t\u00eb shqiptar\u00ebve e kan\u00eb borxh t\u00eb kujdesen vet\u00eb shqiptar\u00ebt.<\/p>\n

Referencat:
\n– Nederlands en\/of Engels? – Taalkeuze met beleid in het Nederlands Hoger Onderwijs – KNAW, 2017
\n– “Nederlands, tenzij…” – Tweetaligheid in de geestes- en de gedrags- en maatschappijwetenschappen, 2003
\n– Zijn het Nederlands en Fries nog te ‘saven’? – 2018\/01\/20 – http:\/\/www.fryslan1.frl\/
\n– UNESCO…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

S. Guraziu – Ars Poetica, Dhjetor 2019 (P\u00ebrsiatje – “Save” (Ruaj) pjes\u00ebt integrale t\u00eb Identitetit Komb\u00ebtar) N\u00eb dekadat e fundit, n\u00eb shum\u00eb fusha k\u00ebrkimore anglishtja \u00ebsht\u00eb zhvilluar n\u00eb nj\u00eb “Lingua franca” – thon\u00eb holandez\u00ebt, ky zhvillim ka avantazhe n\u00eb frym\u00ebn… Lexo →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5104","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-komente"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5104","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5104"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5104\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5104"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5104"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5104"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}