{"id":555,"date":"2019-09-20T14:26:05","date_gmt":"2019-09-20T14:26:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.letrat.eu\/?p=555"},"modified":"2026-04-09T00:41:51","modified_gmt":"2026-04-08T23:41:51","slug":"miti-ovidian-i-narcisit-bukuria-dhe-veset-narcisoide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/?p=555","title":{"rendered":"Miti ovidian i Narcisit – Bukuria dhe “veset” narcisoide!"},"content":{"rendered":"

S. Guraziu – Ars Poetica, Q 2017<\/em><\/p>\n

(pak fjal\u00eb lidhur me bukurin\u00eb dhe “veset” narcisoide, di\u00e7 si “frym\u00ebzim” i shkurt\u00ebr nga piktura e Waterhouse, “Ehoja dhe Narcisi”<\/strong>)<\/p>\n

Piktura: John W. Waterhouse (1849-1917) – Echo and Narcissus<\/strong>, 1903
\n\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Bukuria “fle” n\u00eb syrin e vrojtuesit – thot\u00eb nj\u00eb urt\u00ebsi, dhe kjo i bie dmth. q\u00eb p\u00ebrceptimi i bukuris\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb subjektiv. Ndoshta dhe vet\u00eb Narcisi dikur mendonte se “rr\u00ebnj\u00ebt e k\u00ebsaj th\u00ebnie mund t\u00eb ken\u00eb lindur n\u00eb mendjen e t\u00eb sh\u00ebmtuarve”. Edhe sot e k\u00ebsaj dite disa bukurosh\u00ebr, sidomos filozof\u00eb t\u00eb bukur, pohojn\u00eb: “…\u00ebsht\u00eb thjesht justifikim i t\u00eb sh\u00ebmtuarve”.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb rregull, mund dhe t\u00eb pajtohemi. Por kjo ndoshta nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb, pasi miti i “Ehos\u00eb dhe Narcisit” padyshim ishte shpikje origjinale e Ovidit, n\u00eb “Metamorfozat” e tij. Kjo poem\u00eb narrative e poetit romak, duke kap\u00ebrthyer rreth 250 mite dhe duke u “shtrir\u00eb” p\u00ebr s\u00eb gjati n\u00eb 15 libra, konsiderohet kryevepra ovidiane, si\u00e7 ia thon\u00eb latinisht “magnum opus”. N\u00ebse Ovidi ta ket\u00eb “huazuar” iden\u00eb diku, deri sot s’ka asnj\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Pra, sipas Ovidit, Narcisi ishte nj\u00eb djalosh fort i bukur i cili e refuzoi seksualitetin, e refuzoi oreaden jasht\u00ebzakonisht t\u00eb bukur, nimf\u00ebn Eho dhe ra n\u00eb dashuri me reflektimin e figur\u00ebs s\u00eb vet n\u00eb liqen. Ai u mbyt n\u00eb uj\u00eb dhe, pasi per\u00ebndit\u00eb mitologjike ishin t\u00eb fuqishme, e kthyen n\u00eb nj\u00eb lule q\u00eb sot e mban emrin e tij.<\/p>\n

Ndon\u00ebse, shikuar pak\u00ebz m\u00eb holl, p\u00ebr “fundin” e Narcisit, t\u00ebrthorazi fajet i kishte vet\u00eb kryezot Zeusi. Pse? Zeusit (ose Jupiterit, sipas versionit romak ovidian) i p\u00eblqenin fort nimfat e bukura dhe shpesh i vizitonte ato. Mitologjia na thot\u00eb se ai thjesht ashtu, si nj\u00eb “valentinian” i pashoq q\u00eb ishte, v\u00ebrsulej nga qiejt drejt tok\u00ebs p\u00ebr ta shuar “dashurin\u00eb” pyjeve e l\u00ebndinave t\u00eb Beotias\u00eb. P\u00ebrfundimisht, gruaja e tij legjitime, Per\u00ebndesha Hera (ose Juno, sipas vers. romak), ia filloi me dyshimet dhe erdhi nga Olimpi n\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekje p\u00ebr t\u00eb kapur Zeusin tradhtar. Ehoja, duke dashur ta mbronte Zeusin, u ngat\u00ebrrua me zem\u00ebrimin e Heras\u00eb s\u00eb bashku me konsekuencat si d\u00ebnim, sepse e hutonte at\u00eb me bisedat e gjata. Kur m\u00eb n\u00eb fund Hera e kuptoi, p\u00ebr inat ia reduktoi tmerr\u00ebsisht mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e t\u00eb folurit – tutje e ngrata Eho mund t’i thoshte vet\u00ebm ca fjal\u00eb, s’mund ta zgjaste as nj\u00eb fjali modeste.<\/p>\n

Pra, kur (m\u00eb von\u00eb) Ehoja e takoi Narcisin bukurosh dhe ra n\u00eb dashuri me t\u00eb, nuk ishte n\u00eb gjendje t’i tregonte se \u00e7far\u00eb ndjente. Thjesht i shkonte pas, e ndiqte gjithandej e heshtur. E dhimbshme, p\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr sepse u detyrua ta shikonte at\u00eb derisa ai zhytej n\u00eb dashurin\u00eb “tragjike” me vetveten.<\/p>\n

Un\u00eb p\u00ebr vete t\u00eb gjitha fajet p\u00ebr vuajtjen e Ehos\u00eb dhe p\u00ebr pamund\u00ebsin\u00eb q\u00eb eventualisht ta ndryshonte rrjedhen e mitit lidhur me fundin e Narcisit, ia mvesh jo imagjinat\u00ebs s\u00eb Ovidit, por vet\u00eb frikacak Zeusit. Sepse ai duke patur frik\u00eb nga Hera, thjesht pati ndenjur strukur n\u00eb ka\u00e7ubat, s’guxoi t\u00eb intervenonte, s’pati zem\u00ebr ta mbronte Ehon\u00eb nga d\u00ebnimi i gruas s\u00eb vet. Derisa ajo, p\u00ebrve\u00e7 dashuris\u00eb q\u00eb ia dhuronte aty-k\u00ebtu l\u00ebndinave t\u00eb Beotias\u00eb, sakrifikoi aq shum\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Mund ta harrojm\u00eb dhe fare imagjinat\u00ebn ovidiane, n\u00ebse dhe vet\u00ebm imagjinata piktoriale e mjeshtrit t\u00eb madh J. Waterhouse ishte sadopak n\u00eb rregull, prap\u00ebseprap\u00eb Narcisi konsideronte q\u00eb Ehoja nuk ishte mjaftuesh\u00ebm e bukur, \u00e7far\u00eb turpi! : ) Ovidi na rr\u00ebfen se pas vdekjes s\u00eb Narcisit, edhe Ehoja filloi t\u00eb venitej e t\u00eb tretej. Bukuria e saj u zhduk, l\u00ebkura e saj u rrudhos dhe kockat e saj u kthyen n\u00eb gur. Gjith\u00e7ka q\u00eb ka ngelur nga ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb “eho” e z\u00ebrit t\u00eb saj.<\/p>\n

P\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbushur disi “egoizmin” e tij, narcisizmin e tij, kot\u00ebsin\u00eb e tij, vet\u00eb-dashurin\u00eb e tij, vet\u00eb-admirimin, vet\u00eb-obsesionin… etj. mund t\u00eb pajtohem me Narcisin fare leht\u00eb (dmth. p\u00ebr justifikimin e t\u00eb sh\u00ebmtuarve). Por s’ka shans, s’dua t\u00eb akordohem me dik\u00eb q\u00eb dashurohet ne vetveten – e si t\u00eb pajtohem, e pamundur. Sepse \u00e7do gj\u00eb e k\u00ebsaj bote e ka bukurin\u00eb e vet, anise jo t\u00eb gjith\u00eb e pikasin at\u00eb (e qart\u00eb pra, m\u00eb par\u00eb dua t\u00eb pajtohem me men\u00e7urin\u00eb e Konfu\u00e7ios : )<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

S. Guraziu – Ars Poetica, Q 2017 (pak fjal\u00eb lidhur me bukurin\u00eb dhe “veset” narcisoide, di\u00e7 si “frym\u00ebzim” i shkurt\u00ebr nga piktura e Waterhouse, “Ehoja dhe Narcisi”) Piktura: John W. Waterhouse (1849-1917) – Echo and Narcissus, 1903 Bukuria “fle” n\u00eb… Lexo →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-555","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-classic","category-komente"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/555","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=555"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/555\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}