{"id":9617,"date":"2021-12-14T13:56:56","date_gmt":"2021-12-14T12:56:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/?p=9617"},"modified":"2024-04-09T08:21:48","modified_gmt":"2024-04-09T07:21:48","slug":"valle-e-di-kush-ceshte-e-verteta","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/?p=9617","title":{"rendered":"Vall\u00eb e di kush \u00e7’\u00ebsht\u00eb e “v\u00ebrteta”?"},"content":{"rendered":"

S. Guraziu – AP, D 2021<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

1 – Fran\u00e7oise Gilot* – “Pylli i Gjall\u00eb, 1977
2 – Fran\u00e7ois Lemoyne (1688-1737) – “Koha mbron t\u00eb V\u00ebrtet\u00ebn nga G\u00ebnjeshtra dhe Zilia”<\/p><\/div>\n

Picasso g\u00ebnjente artistikisht-bukur, padyshim do na dilte “g\u00ebnjeshtari” m\u00eb i madh i t\u00eb gjitha koh\u00ebrave, meq\u00eb ishte i shquar sidomos p\u00ebr kuantitetin. Kjo fjali q\u00eb sapo e shkrova, ndoshta ting\u00ebllon si g\u00ebnjesht\u00ebr, por jo, \u00ebsht\u00eb e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb!<\/p>\n

Por vall\u00eb e di kush \u00e7’\u00ebsht\u00eb e “v\u00ebrteta”? Madje dhe vet\u00eb Ni\u00e7eja, ai filozof-mustakologu i famsh\u00ebm, e pati shtruar t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn pyetje. Dallimi \u00ebsht\u00eb se (ai vet\u00eb pyeste dhe vet\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjej), pyeste kur s’e dinte, e ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb dhe kur e dinte.
\nPsh. “\u00c7’\u00ebsht\u00eb e v\u00ebrteta?<\/em> (pati pyetur – pastaj qe p\u00ebrgjigjur) Nj\u00eb ushtri e l\u00ebvizshme metaforash, metonimish, antropomorfizmash, me nj\u00eb fjal\u00eb, nj\u00eb p\u00ebrmbledhje e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieve njer\u00ebzore q\u00eb jan\u00eb p\u00ebrmir\u00ebsuar, ekstrapoluar, zbukuruar poetikisht, retorikisht dhe q\u00eb, pas p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb zgjatur, duken t\u00eb fiksuara, ‘kanonike’ (t\u00eb pranuara), obligative p\u00ebr njer\u00ebzit<\/em>” – e qart\u00eb se k\u00ebsaj radhe Ni\u00e7eja e dinte : )<\/p>\n

Historia e shkrimeve t\u00eb njeriut aq e gjat\u00eb, panum\u00ebr njer\u00ebz t\u00eb shquar flisnin (dhe ende flasin) me superlativa p\u00ebr t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebn. Sidomos filozof\u00ebt e \u00e7mojn\u00eb aq shum\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebn, e v\u00ebrteta “absolute” ndoshta as nuk ekziston, prap\u00ebseprap\u00eb asgj\u00eb m\u00eb e lart\u00eb, m\u00eb e \u00e7muar sesa e v\u00ebrteta – thon\u00eb ata.<\/p>\n

Nga ana tjet\u00ebr, q\u00ebmoti n\u00eb lasht\u00ebsi e dinin dhe at\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebn e vock\u00ebl – n\u00ebse ndokush e shpalos t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebn (n\u00ebse e demaskon… ia heq mask\u00ebn g\u00ebnjeshtr\u00ebs) padyshim do jet\u00eb nga m\u00eb t\u00eb “urryerit” e shoq\u00ebris\u00eb (Platoni).
\nDiogjeni psh. e kishte pik\u00ebrisht k\u00ebt\u00eb ves, ai madje sikur tallej, kahdo q\u00eb v\u00ebrtitej a rrotullohej tallej me maskat e realitetit. Ves i rreziksh\u00ebm sa mos pyet.<\/p>\n

Jo vet\u00ebm se i shp\u00ebrfillte rregullat, standardet e fa\u00e7adat e etikave, jo vet\u00ebm se dhe vet\u00eb jet\u00ebn e vet e trajtonte me “nihilizma”, m\u00eb shum\u00eb i respektonte canis-bisedat, dmth. me qent\u00eb-miqt\u00eb e vet, sesa me Aleksandrin e Madh, jo vet\u00ebm se nuk \u00e7ante kok\u00ebn p\u00ebr “rregullat bazike shoq\u00ebrore”, jo vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr cinizmat e nihilizmat, gjithsesi… sa p\u00ebr p\u00ebrbuzjen e rregullave s’ishte aq i vetmuar, kishte dhe plot t\u00eb tjer\u00eb varfanjak\u00eb, s’do ta urrente kush vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Problemi \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb i thell\u00eb – vesi q\u00eb askujt s’i “p\u00eblqente” \u00ebsht\u00eb se ai e shkapuriste t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebn bazike t\u00eb jet\u00ebs deri n\u00eb ekstrem.
\nDhe Platoni kishte t\u00eb drejt\u00eb (jo se dhe ky e urrente… ok, ndoshta pak\u00ebzzzz, meq\u00eb Diogjeni ia pati “shpuplosur pul\u00ebn” dhe atij, por) sepse gjithkush q\u00eb e shqyen “mask\u00ebn g\u00ebnjeshtare” t\u00eb realitetit, cilidokush q\u00eb e prish “artistik\u00ebn e g\u00ebnjesht\u00ebrt” t\u00eb jet\u00ebs, do jet\u00eb i urryer.<\/p>\n

“Filozof\u00ebt duhet ta krijojn\u00eb nj\u00eb kult t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebn, jo ndonj\u00eb ‘roman’… (p\u00ebr jet\u00ebn dhe aksh filozof\u00ebt a mendimtar\u00ebt)<\/em> – pati shkruar poeti dhe shkrimtari argjentinas Jorge Livraga. “N\u00eb antikitetin klasik (kur mendohej p\u00ebr nj\u00eb akt heroik ose p\u00ebr t’i dh\u00ebn\u00eb pak shk\u00eblqim pun\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrditshme…) g\u00ebnjeshtra konsiderohej di\u00e7 si nj\u00eb lloj krijimi artistik dhe, ende sot shum\u00eb shkrimtar\u00eb me fantazit\u00eb e tyre rikrijojn\u00eb situata dhe ngjarje t\u00eb imagjinuara, t\u00eb paqena. Poezia, muzika dhe teatri i ‘forcojn\u00eb’ n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb pothuaj hyjnore nuancat gri t\u00eb jet\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrditshme<\/em>.” – pati th\u00ebn\u00eb ai.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb rregull (n\u00eb lasht\u00ebsi, kur p\u00ebrdorej p\u00ebr q\u00ebllime t\u00eb larta), g\u00ebnjeshtra konsiderohej di\u00e7 si art, si nj\u00eb lloj niveli i lart\u00eb i g\u00ebnjeshtrimit. Nga kjo vetiu na imponohet q\u00eb ta nxjerrim thelbin se arti n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsi na qenka di\u00e7 e g\u00ebnjesht\u00ebrt, falsitet i bukur, “falsitet fisnik”, g\u00ebnjesht\u00ebr e nevojshme. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb pik\u00eb e v\u00ebrteta aq af\u00ebr t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebs. Madje dhe vet\u00eb Picasso (nj\u00ebri nga ububu-artist\u00ebt, nga m\u00eb t\u00eb njohurit dhe t\u00eb bujshmit e shek. XX) pati th\u00ebn\u00eb: “t\u00eb gjith\u00eb e dim\u00eb se arti \u00ebsht\u00eb g\u00ebnjesht\u00ebr… ama g\u00ebnjesht\u00ebr e nevojshme<\/em>“.<\/p>\n

Meq\u00eb arti pra di\u00e7 si g\u00ebnjesht\u00ebr e nevojshme, pakashum\u00eb “nj\u00ebsoj” si\u00e7 dhe puna \u00ebsht\u00eb di\u00e7 e nevojshme (jo tashm\u00eb duke menduar n\u00eb marksistet… se gjoja “puna e pati krijuar njeriun”, por rishtas duke aluduar n\u00eb Picasso-n) – sipas tij puna \u00ebsht\u00eb di\u00e7 si alarm, andaj “njeriu e pati shpikur or\u00ebn me zile, or\u00ebn alarmuese”.<\/p>\n

Nga filozofia pikasiane tutje aq e leht\u00eb ta nxjerrim \u00ebmb\u00eblsin\u00eb e s\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebs…
\nZhurma e ziles m\u00ebngjesore \u00ebsht\u00eb “alarmi” (p\u00ebr t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebn), nd\u00ebrsa zbukurimi i dit\u00ebs me ca detaje imagjinare (p\u00ebrzier me realitetin) \u00ebsht\u00eb Art. Psh. dita zbukurohet me ndonj\u00eb vizit\u00eb pikasolinash n\u00eb studio, me ndonj\u00eb mpuuu\u00e7 mpuuu\u00e7, me ndonj\u00eb portret “surrealist”, me ndonj\u00eb hund\u00eb t\u00eb shtremb\u00ebruar t\u00eb Olga Koklova, t\u00eb Dora Maar, me ndonj\u00eb nudo-realiz\u00ebm t\u00eb Marie-Therese Walter, t\u00eb Fran\u00e7oise Gilot, t\u00eb Jacqueline Roque, me ndonj\u00eb puf-puf, me ndonj\u00eb foto-pozim, me ndonj\u00eb reklamim, me ndonj\u00eb vizatim… etj etj., dmth. ngjyrosja e gris\u00eb s\u00eb p\u00ebrditshm\u00ebris\u00eb me g\u00ebnjeshtrat e \u00ebmbla, \u00ebsht\u00eb Art.<\/p>\n

E dinin ata t\u00eb lasht\u00ebsis\u00eb, e dinte dhe vet\u00eb Diogjeni, e dinte fare mir\u00eb, tjet\u00ebr se i p\u00eblqente t\u00eb merrej me cinizma p\u00ebr “maskeradat e jet\u00ebs” – gjithsesi, e dinte dhe Platoni, sikur q\u00eb e dinte dhe Picasso-ja i modernizmit artistik. Fatlumnisht, edhe koh\u00ebt tona kontemporane (post-pikasiane) e kan\u00eb trash\u00ebguar gjith\u00eb “trash\u00ebgimin\u00eb” p\u00ebr t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebn…<\/p>\n

Dhe kur dihet se (nga 91 vjet gjithsej) plot 80 vjet Picasso nuk qe ndalur, prore duke “punuar”, duke na “g\u00ebnjyer artistikisht”, i pati l\u00ebn\u00eb jo m\u00eb pak por 50.000 “shenja e d\u00ebshmi t\u00eb v\u00ebrteta”, 50.000 g\u00ebnjeshtra t\u00eb bukura dhe t\u00eb nevojshme. Padyshim do jet\u00eb di\u00e7 si rekord sa i p\u00ebrket “g\u00ebnjeshtrave artistike”, nga k\u00ebto 50.000 dhe vet\u00ebm 3 sosh qen\u00eb shitur p\u00ebr afro gjysm\u00eb miliardi, nj\u00ebra 175 milion\u00eb, tjetra 140 milion\u00eb e treta kam harruar sa ishte sakt\u00eb, por mbi 100 milion\u00eb. Imagjino, ngelin dmth. dhe 49.997 “g\u00ebnjeshtra pikasiane” q\u00eb t’i kullufisin qindra-milionat…<\/p>\n

Sidoqoft\u00eb, s’ishin k\u00ebso lloj “g\u00ebnjeshtrash” p\u00ebr \u00e7far\u00eb poeti argjentinas pati folur at\u00ebbot\u00eb. U muar vesh, g\u00ebnjeshtrat artistike megjithat\u00eb jan\u00eb di\u00e7 si… ku di, harrova si duhet th\u00ebn\u00eb tani, nj\u00ebfar\u00eblloj “g\u00ebnjeshtrash fisnike” : ) Poeti Livraga m\u00eb shum\u00eb e kishte fjal\u00ebn p\u00ebr g\u00ebnjeshtrat ordinere, p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsisht dashakeqe, g\u00ebnjeshtra q\u00eb e shtremb\u00ebrojn\u00eb, e shp\u00ebrfytyrojn\u00eb realitetin dhe njer\u00ebzit.<\/p>\n

T\u00eb tilla g\u00ebnjeshtra dhe lig\u00ebsi, kuptohet na vijn\u00eb nga “ata q\u00eb, t\u00eb ushqyer nga egoizmi dhe kot\u00ebsia, i fundosin n\u00eb balt\u00ebn e kritik\u00ebs s\u00eb lig\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekjet m\u00eb fisnike, arritjet m\u00eb t\u00eb bukura. Ose i maskojn\u00eb ujq\u00ebrit si dele q\u00eb ta han\u00eb kopen\u00eb me leht\u00ebsi… G\u00ebnjeshtra nuk shkon kurr\u00eb p\u00ebrtej t\u00eb q\u00ebnit nj\u00eb fllusk\u00eb e gazt\u00eb brenda qarkullimit t\u00eb gjakut t\u00eb ngroht\u00eb… t\u00eb Jet\u00ebs<\/em>” – qe shprehur.<\/p>\n

[ ngjitur:
\n1 – Fran\u00e7oise Gilot* – “Pylli i Gjall\u00eb<\/strong>“, 1977
\n2 (djathtas) – Fran\u00e7ois Lemoyne (1688-1737) – “Koha mbron t\u00eb V\u00ebrtet\u00ebn nga G\u00ebnjeshtra dhe Zilia<\/strong>” ]<\/p>\n

* Fran\u00e7oise Gilot, artiste franceze, tashm\u00eb 100-vje\u00e7are, nuk qen\u00eb martuar por pati jetuar me Picasso-n p\u00ebr 10 vjet, n\u00ebna e dy f\u00ebmij\u00ebve t\u00eb tyre, Claude dhe Paloma Picasso, Gilot do ishte e vetmja fem\u00ebr q\u00eb pati “guxuar” ta donte dhe ta linte Picasso-n, e vetmja q\u00eb i pati th\u00ebn\u00eb “bye” xhufurrakut : )<\/p>\n

– – –<\/p>\n

Pablo Diego Jos\u00e9 Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno Crisp\u00edn Crispiniano Mar\u00eda Remedios de la Sant\u00edsima Trinidad Ruiz Picasso
\n(emri i plot\u00eb… ama b\u00ebn dhe shkurt, psh. Pika\u00e7o : )
\n[ Fotot: Arnold Newman – Picasso n\u00eb Kan\u00eb, Franc\u00eb, 11 Shtator 1956 ]<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

S. Guraziu – AP, D 2021 Picasso g\u00ebnjente artistikisht-bukur, padyshim do na dilte “g\u00ebnjeshtari” m\u00eb i madh i t\u00eb gjitha koh\u00ebrave, meq\u00eb ishte i shquar sidomos p\u00ebr kuantitetin. Kjo fjali q\u00eb sapo e shkrova, ndoshta ting\u00ebllon si g\u00ebnjesht\u00ebr, por jo,… Lexo →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9617","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-komente"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9617","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9617"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9617\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9617"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9617"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/letrat.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}